{"id":250,"date":"2026-10-16T13:59:57","date_gmt":"2026-10-16T13:59:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/majella.mighty-krulz.si\/science\/"},"modified":"2026-10-16T21:13:43","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T21:13:43","slug":"science","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/majella.mighty-krulz.si\/sl\/science\/","title":{"rendered":"Science"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nEvidence\n<\/p>

\nThe science, IN FULL<\/span>.\n<\/h1>

\nFour measurements sit behind this product. Three were made by independent university laboratories. One is ours. Below is all of it - the methods, the numbers, the published research we lean on, and the things we have not proven.\n<\/p><\/div><\/div>

\n2 independent lab tests\n<\/p>

\n1 internal wear study\n<\/p>

\n1 clinical study in preparation\n<\/p><\/div>

\n<\/rect><\/rect><\/rect><\/rect><\/rect><\/rect><\/path><\/path><\/path><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/rect><\/clipPath><\/rect><\/clipPath><\/defs><\/svg>\n<\/div><\/div>\"Man<\/section>

\nUniversity of Ljubljana\n<\/p>

\nWhere it was tested\n<\/p><\/div>

<\/div>

\n\u22121.3\u00b0C\n<\/p>

\nMax measured vs cotton\n<\/p><\/div>

<\/div>

\n99.99%\n<\/p>

\nRF blocked by fabric 2\u20136 GHz\n<\/p><\/div>

<\/div>

\n3.4\u00d7\n<\/p>

\nAir permeability vs cotton\n<\/p><\/div><\/section>

\nHow to read this page\n<\/p>

\nWe label EVIDENCE<\/span> by who produced it.\n<\/h2>

\nIt is an unusual thing to do and it makes our own numbers look weaker. We do it anyway, because in a category this full of promises the labelling is the only thing that makes any of the numbers worth reading.\n<\/p><\/div><\/div>

\nIndependent\n<\/p>

\nMeasured by someone else\n<\/h3>

\nA university laboratory, using a standard method, on a sample we sent them. We report the number they gave us and name the institution.\n<\/p><\/div>

\nLimit:\n<\/strong>\nthese are tests of the fabric. not of a body.\n<\/span><\/p><\/article>

\nOur own\n<\/p>

\nMeasured by us\n<\/h3>

\nOur internal wear testing. Real conditions, small sample, no blinding, no peer review. Useful, and clearly not the same category of evidence.\n<\/p><\/div>

\nLimit:\n<\/strong>\nnot a clinical trial, and we never present it as one.\n<\/span><\/p><\/article>

\nPublished\n<\/p>

\nMeasured by researchers\n<\/h3>

\nPeer-reviewed work by other people, on temperature and on radiofrequency exposure generally. It explains why any of this is worth measuring.\n<\/p><\/div>

\nLimit:\n<\/strong>\nnone of it studies this product.\n<\/span><\/p><\/article><\/div><\/section>

\"Thermal

\nRegular
underwear\n<\/p>

\nMajella
underwear\n<\/p><\/div>

\nThe premise\n<\/p>

\nWhy testicular temperature is WORTH MEASURING<\/span>.\n<\/h2>

\nTesticles sit outside the body for a simple biological reason: sperm production requires a temperature 2\u20136 \u00b0C below core body temperature.\n<\/p>

\nModern daily habits \u2014 eight hours in an office chair, hot cars, and synthetic underwear \u2014 trap heat and narrow this vital gap.\n<\/p><\/div><\/div>

\n\"Scrotal hyperthermia impairs sperm concentration and motility, with prolonged desk sitting increasing temperatures by up to 2.0 \u00b0C.\"\n<\/p>

\n\u2014 Human Reproduction Update & Journal of Andrology\n<\/p><\/blockquote>

\nThis biological fact isn't ours, nor is it controversial. What we set out to prove is simple: can redesigned underwear restore that natural temperature gap, and by how much?\n<\/p><\/div><\/section>

\nThe modern environment\n<\/p>

\nRadiofrequency protection, grounded in EVIDENCE<\/span>.\n<\/h2>

\nPhones stay in our pockets all day, right next to sensitive tissue. A growing and consistent body of research highlights the link between radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and reduced semen quality.\n<\/p><\/div>

\n\"RF-EMF exposure from mobile phones is consistently associated with decreased sperm viability, motility, and increased oxidative stress.\"\n<\/p>

\n\u2014 Environmental Research & Central European Journal of Urology\n<\/p><\/blockquote>

\nRadiation affects male reproductive tissue in two primary ways: it causes localized micro-thermal heating and triggers cellular stress, both of which impair optimal sperm production.\n<\/p>

\nBecause phones and Wi-Fi are now an unavoidable part of daily life, we integrated silver-fiber shielding directly into our fabric. Lab-tested to block up to 99.99% of RF radiation, it provides a direct, active barrier where exposure is highest.\n<\/p><\/div><\/div>

\"Phone<\/div><\/section>

\nThe three tests\n<\/p>

\nWhat we measured, and HOW<\/span>.\n<\/h2><\/div>
\n\n\n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n